IAG Faces New Allegations Amid Loyalty Pricing Scandal
IAG Faces New Allegations Amid Loyalty Pricing Scandal
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
IAG, a prominent insurance provider, has announced its intention to contest a class action put forth by law firm Slater and Gordon in the Victorian Supreme Court.
This lawsuit alleges that IAG misled customers by promising loyalty discounts on home and contents policy renewals that were not genuine.
The class action primarily concerns renewals under the RACV, SGIO, and SGIC brands-already subjects of a Federal Court case initiated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which IAG is also disputing.
Slater and Gordon indicate that over 1 million policyholders renewed their insurance with these brands during the six-year period under scrutiny. The firm believes the class action might result in financial compensation reaching millions of dollars.
The allegation from the law firm centers around claims that IAG engaged in deceptive and unconscionable practices. Customers were purportedly led to believe they were receiving loyalty discounts, while they may have been paying inflated base premiums, effectively nullifying the promised reductions.
According to Ben Hardwick, the leader of the class actions practice at Slater and Gordon, a sophisticated pricing algorithm used by IAG determined customers' likelihood of switching insurers. Those likely to stay with their existing insurer were allegedly subjected to higher premium increases.
"Loyal customers believed they were benefitting from discounts when, in reality, their base premiums were increased before any discount was applied," Hardwick explained. "Given that home and contents insurance is a significant expense for many Australians, the notion that loyal customers were possibly exploited in this manner is particularly troubling."
IAG, for its part, denies these allegations. The company stated that its subsidiaries, Insurance Australia Ltd (IAL) and Insurance Manufacturers of Australia (IMA), have delivered on all loyalty discount promises and maintained that they did not mislead customers about the scope of these discounts.
"Both IAL and IMA will vigorously defend the claims brought forth by Slater and Gordon," the company declared.
The contested policies, provided by RACV, SGIO, and SGIC, covered customers in Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, respectively. In addition, Slater and Gordon are investigating similar issues with NRMA Insurance, which operates in every state except Victoria.
ASIC's Federal Court case targets policies issued under the SGIO and SGIC brands between August 2017 and January 2023, and RACV policies from August 2017 to August 2023. A case management hearing is set for October 3.
Last year, ASIC identified misleading pricing promises in the insurance sector as an enforcement priority after discovering that many companies lacked adequate systems to ensure they honored their commitments to customers.
In June of the previous year, the Federal Court fined IAG $40 million for failing to uphold discount promises for NRMA-branded policies. Such policies included motor, home, boat, and caravan insurance, and involved a price "cupping mechanism."
Additionally, the court fined RACQ $10 million in November for potentially misleading disclosures regarding available discounts in certain product statements.
According to an ASIC report from June last year, insurers were expected to remit over $815 million to more than 5.6 million consumers stemming from pricing failures identified and reported since January 2018. This involved over 6.5 million policies.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
New Zealand’s latest insurance dispute figures are a timely warning for anyone relying on personal cover to protect their household income. The Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman Scheme reported that, for the year ended 30 June 2026, health insurance became the largest category of disputes it investigated for the first time, with health disputes up 91 percent and 833 dispute investigations completed across all categories. - read more
The 2026 National Truck Accident Research Centre major incident report gives Australian truck operators a useful, if challenging, snapshot of where serious heavy vehicle risk is changing. Released in October 2026 and based on de-identified NTI-insured heavy vehicle major-loss claims, the report points to progress on distraction and fatigue, while also highlighting renewed concern about inappropriate speed and following distance. - read more
A federal parliamentary inquiry into small business insurance has pushed back its reporting timetable, extending the wait for recommendations on insurance affordability, availability and regulation. Insurance News reported on 27 October 2026 that the inquiry, which had been expected to report that day, now intends to table its final report by 26 February 2027 after receiving extensive evidence from across the market. - read more
Australia’s proposed overhaul of the General Insurance Code of Practice has moved from consultation to regulator review, with the Insurance Council of Australia lodging a strengthened code with ASIC on 22 October 2026. For shop owners, this is not an instant change to policy terms, but it is a significant development in how insurers may be expected to handle claims, complaints, vulnerability and customer communication in the next phase of the market. - read more
New research from specialist insurer CFC, reported on 26 October 2026, has put a sharper number on a problem many Australian small businesses already sense: cyber risk is moving faster than insurance take-up. CFC’s local findings indicate seven in 10 Australian SMEs surveyed experienced a cyber incident in the past three years, while standalone cyber policy uptake is still estimated at only 10% to 15%. - read more
In the realm of securing one’s health and wellbeing, navigating the Australian health insurance landscape can be as critical as the care received. It stands as a complex tapestry, woven with policies, premiums, and government incentives, affecting individuals and families nationwide. - read more
Australia is renowned for its iconic landmarks, diverse ecosystems, and robust healthcare system. While the public healthcare system, Medicare, provides essential health services, it might not cover everything. The allure of private health coverage lies in its promise of broader options, reduced wait times, and coverage for services not included in Medicare, like dental and optical care. - read more
Health insurance is a critical part of maintaining your well-being and financial stability. In Australia, understanding the basics of health insurance can help you make informed decisions that protect you during unforeseen medical events. - read more
In today's rapidly changing health insurance landscape in Australia, keeping track of costs and coverage can be daunting. Many Australians find themselves grappling with high premiums that seem to increase year after year. - read more
Health insurance is more than just a precautionary measure; it's a vital component in managing both your health and financial well-being. In Australia, where healthcare costs can quickly escalate, health insurance extras serve as a buffer, ensuring that services like dental, optical, and physiotherapy remain within reach. These extras can significantly reduce the out-of-pocket expenses you might otherwise encounter for non-hospital treatments. - read more
Knowledgebase
Elimination Period: The time period between an injury and the receipt of benefit payments from an insurer, particularly in disability insurance.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.