IAG Faces New Allegations Amid Loyalty Pricing Scandal
IAG Faces New Allegations Amid Loyalty Pricing Scandal
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
IAG, a prominent insurance provider, has announced its intention to contest a class action put forth by law firm Slater and Gordon in the Victorian Supreme Court.
This lawsuit alleges that IAG misled customers by promising loyalty discounts on home and contents policy renewals that were not genuine.
The class action primarily concerns renewals under the RACV, SGIO, and SGIC brands—already subjects of a Federal Court case initiated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which IAG is also disputing.
Slater and Gordon indicate that over 1 million policyholders renewed their insurance with these brands during the six-year period under scrutiny. The firm believes the class action might result in financial compensation reaching millions of dollars.
The allegation from the law firm centers around claims that IAG engaged in deceptive and unconscionable practices. Customers were purportedly led to believe they were receiving loyalty discounts, while they may have been paying inflated base premiums, effectively nullifying the promised reductions.
According to Ben Hardwick, the leader of the class actions practice at Slater and Gordon, a sophisticated pricing algorithm used by IAG determined customers' likelihood of switching insurers. Those likely to stay with their existing insurer were allegedly subjected to higher premium increases.
"Loyal customers believed they were benefitting from discounts when, in reality, their base premiums were increased before any discount was applied," Hardwick explained. "Given that home and contents insurance is a significant expense for many Australians, the notion that loyal customers were possibly exploited in this manner is particularly troubling."
IAG, for its part, denies these allegations. The company stated that its subsidiaries, Insurance Australia Ltd (IAL) and Insurance Manufacturers of Australia (IMA), have delivered on all loyalty discount promises and maintained that they did not mislead customers about the scope of these discounts.
"Both IAL and IMA will vigorously defend the claims brought forth by Slater and Gordon," the company declared.
The contested policies, provided by RACV, SGIO, and SGIC, covered customers in Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, respectively. In addition, Slater and Gordon are investigating similar issues with NRMA Insurance, which operates in every state except Victoria.
ASIC's Federal Court case targets policies issued under the SGIO and SGIC brands between August 2017 and January 2023, and RACV policies from August 2017 to August 2023. A case management hearing is set for October 3.
Last year, ASIC identified misleading pricing promises in the insurance sector as an enforcement priority after discovering that many companies lacked adequate systems to ensure they honored their commitments to customers.
In June of the previous year, the Federal Court fined IAG $40 million for failing to uphold discount promises for NRMA-branded policies. Such policies included motor, home, boat, and caravan insurance, and involved a price "cupping mechanism."
Additionally, the court fined RACQ $10 million in November for potentially misleading disclosures regarding available discounts in certain product statements.
According to an ASIC report from June last year, insurers were expected to remit over $815 million to more than 5.6 million consumers stemming from pricing failures identified and reported since January 2018. This involved over 6.5 million policies.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A fresh National Heavy Vehicle Regulator action against a heavy vehicle operator is a timely reminder that insurance risk is not limited to what happens at the moment of a crash. The NHVR announced on 30 October 2026 that it had issued a prohibition notice after identifying significant and ongoing safety risks, including repeated defects in safety-critical systems and concerns about the operator’s management controls. - read more
A recent income protection dispute has put fresh attention on a difficult but important issue for Australian workers: a medical condition may be treated as pre-existing even where a formal diagnosis comes later. The case, reported on 9 November 2026, involved a prostate cancer claim that was declined after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority accepted that earlier medical warning signs and specialist investigations were enough to trigger a pre-existing condition exclusion. - read more
The Fair Work Commission’s varied fuel cost recovery order will restart obligations from 23 November 2026, requiring covered road transport contractual chains to account for higher fuel costs against the 6 March 2026 benchmark. For truck operators, the immediate issue is contract pricing, but the insurance angle is also important: cash flow, route choices, subcontracting arrangements and vehicle utilisation all influence how risk is presented and managed. - read more
A Queensland Court of Appeal decision involving AIA Australia has put renewed attention on how technical policy conditions can affect total and permanent disability claims, and why business owners should not treat insurance wording as a background detail. The case concerned group TPD cover held through superannuation, but its broader message is relevant to SMEs that rely on life, TPD and disability-style cover to protect debt, ownership arrangements and business continuity. - read more
APRA’s latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics, released on 16 October 2026 and covering the 12 months to 30 June 2026, provide a useful reminder for Australian businesses: the practical value of cover often depends on how clearly it is structured, documented and understood before a claim ever arises. - read more
The modern Australian family faces a dynamic and ever-evolving set of health needs, with access to quality healthcare remaining a cornerstone of managing our wellbeing. As these needs shift through the different stages of life, the assurance of having a safety net in place can provide unparalleled peace of mind. It's this sense of security that makes adequate health insurance coverage indispensable in today's fast-paced society. - read more
The dawn of the digital age has significantly transformed the way we approach nearly every aspect of our lives, and the domain of health insurance is no exception. With the arrival of innovative digital tools, the health insurance landscape has undergone a striking evolution, allowing for unprecedented accessibility and convenience in managing healthcare coverage. - read more
Private health insurance is an essential consideration for many Australians. It provides peace of mind, knowing that you and your family have access to the best possible healthcare when needed. - read more
With healthcare being a critical aspect of every family's well-being in Australia, securing the right family health insurance is not just a necessity but a responsibility. Recognizing the importance of this safety net is the first step towards safeguarding the future health needs of your loved ones. Balancing comprehensive coverage against affordable premiums can seem overwhelming with a multitude of plans available. - read more
The current health insurance landscape in Australia can be quite confusing for many people. With numerous options available, it’s not always clear which to choose to balance your budget with your needs. Premiums are on the rise, and Australians are becoming increasingly concerned about the costs of maintaining adequate coverage. - read more
Knowledgebase
Double Indemnity: A clause or provision in a life insurance policy that doubles the payout in cases of accidental death.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.