Landmark Genetic Test Protection Gains Massive Support

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Prominent support has come from the Council of Australian Life Insurers alongside professionals from the medical and legal fields.

Michelle James, the national president of the Australian Lawyers Alliance, applauded the ban announced by Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones, saying it represents “great news” for consumers.

Historically, the life insurance sector regulated itself through a moratorium started in 2019, which addressed concerns that individuals might avoid genetic testing due to fear that unfavorable results could impact their ability to secure affordable life insurance.

This moratorium was indefinitely extended under revisions to the industry’s code of practice in July of last year. However, it stopped short of a complete prohibition. For example, the moratorium allowed insurers to use genetic test results if an individual's total lump sum death coverage exceeded $500,000.

According to Ms. James, “The life insurance industry’s partial, self-regulated moratorium on using genetic results has not sufficiently protected consumers. Hence, legislating to prohibit insurers from using genetic test results in life underwriting is essential.” She emphasized that this development ensures individuals can make choices about genetic testing without worrying about insurance repercussions.

Steve Robson, president of the Australian Medical Association, underscored the significant positive impact of this policy change on both consumers and the health system. He stated, “We know that the fear of being denied insurance coverage has been a major deterrent for Australians who might benefit from genetic testing.”

The decision for a legislative ban followed a Treasury consultation earlier this year, wherein three potential strategies were suggested: maintaining the status quo, enforcing a complete or partial ban, or instituting financial thresholds for insurance companies regarding the use of genetic test results.

Christine Cupitt, CEO of the Council of Australian Life Insurers, commented on the consultations, expressing the group's consistent stance on the necessity for stringent regulations to prevent anyone from avoiding genetic tests out of fear. “We have long been clear about the need for strict regulation to ensure no one is deterred from taking a genetic test to proactively manage their health,” she said.

Minister Jones' announcement of this landmark prohibition signals a significant turning point in ensuring that Australians can pursue genetic testing crucial for their health without the looming threat of insurance discrimination based on their genetic information.

Published:Tuesday, 17th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Softer Professional Indemnity Pricing Creates a Timely Cover Check

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh July 2026 market commentary suggests Australian professional indemnity conditions have moved further into a buyer-friendly phase, with stronger insurer competition and available capital placing downward pressure on premiums. For consultants, advisers, accountants, IT providers, designers, engineers and other service-based businesses, this may create a useful renewal window. However, the key message is not simply that cover may be cheaper. It is that businesses should use the softer market to improve protection before conditions change again. - read more

What a Personal Accident Claim Ruling Means for Real Estate Professionals

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision is a timely reminder that a stressful or threatening incident does not automatically trigger every personal accident policy. The dispute involved a ride-share driver who experienced significant psychological symptoms after being spat on and verbally abused by a passenger. Although medical evidence indicated the incident worsened previously stable mental health conditions and affected his capacity to work, the insurer declined the claim because the policy responded to bodily injury. - read more

Bali Theft Warnings Highlight a Bigger Travel Insurance Question

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent reports of phone and jewellery snatch-thefts in popular Bali tourist areas have put personal belongings back in the travel insurance spotlight. For Australians heading to Indonesia, the issue is not simply whether a stolen phone can be claimed. It is whether the policy they choose properly matches the risks they are most likely to face while away. - read more

New Small Business Insurance Education Push Highlights Underinsurance Risk

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A new alliance between the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Zest Insurance is putting small business underinsurance back in the spotlight, with education, practical tools and risk resources to be delivered through the Chamber’s THRIVE program. - read more

Why a Food Delivery Theft Claim Matters for Restaurant Insurance

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent insurance dispute involving a food delivery business offers a practical warning for Australian restaurant and café operators: if a location is not listed on the policy schedule, the cover may not respond when something goes wrong. - read more

Click for more Insurance News