Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

APRA Enforces Additional Capital Requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed an additional $2 million capital requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia (SIA), citing significant deficiencies in the insurer's risk management framework and regulatory reporting practices. This action underscores the critical importance of robust risk management within the insurance industry. - read more

Soft Market Conditions Persist in Australian Commercial Insurance Through H1 2026

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian commercial insurance market has maintained its soft stance throughout the first half of 2026, presenting advantageous conditions for buyers. This trend is characterized by stable or declining premiums, expanded insurer capacity, and increased competition across various insurance lines. - read more

2026-27 Federal Budget: Key Impacts on the Australian Insurance Industry

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Government's 2026-27 Federal Budget, presented by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, introduces several measures with direct implications for the insurance sector. These initiatives aim to address challenges such as property insurance costs and underinsurance, while certain omissions have raised questions within the industry. - read more

NRMA's Departure from Farm Insurance: What It Means for Australian Farmers

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant shift within the Australian insurance landscape, NRMA has announced its withdrawal from the farm insurance market, ceasing the sale of new policies as of July 1, 2025. This decision affects both hobby and commercial farm insurance policies, leaving many farmers in search of alternative coverage options. - read more

Achmea and Protected Cropping Australia Join Forces to Support Greenhouse Farmers

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Achmea Farm Insurance and Protected Cropping Australia (PCA) have announced a strategic partnership aimed at bolstering risk mitigation and resilience within Australia's protected cropping sector. This collaboration seeks to empower greenhouse and glasshouse growers by providing tailored insurance solutions and fostering knowledge exchange on best practices. - read more

Click for more Insurance News