Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Broker Remuneration Debate Puts Disclosure on the Agenda

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The debate over Australia’s draft Insurance Brokers Code of Practice has intensified, with industry and consumer voices questioning whether the proposed changes go far enough on remuneration disclosure and conflict management. For real estate agencies, the issue is not abstract. Many agencies rely on intermediated advice when arranging professional indemnity, public liability, management liability, cyber cover, office insurance and commercial motor policies. - read more

Overseas Medical Emergency Puts Travel Insurance Back in Focus

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Australian travel insurance case has offered a sharp reminder that the most expensive travel risk is often the one no traveller expects. According to Finder, an Australian woman who became seriously ill while 19 weeks pregnant in Mallorca faced medical costs of more than $40,000 after being taken to hospital by ambulance. The ambulance component alone reportedly reached $12,000, with the remaining costs linked to hospital admission, testing and treatment. - read more

What Unfair Trading Reform Could Mean for Small Business Insurance Claims

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest unfair trading practices reform has opened a fresh debate for the insurance sector, with small business advocates and insurers watching closely to see whether the new rules will eventually extend into business-to-business dealings. - read more

What Victoria’s Bushfire Loss Estimate Means for Restaurant Cover

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest bushfire loss update offers a practical warning for restaurant, café and hospitality operators: natural catastrophe risk is not confined to homes, farms or large industrial sites. Perils has lifted its estimate for the January 2026 Victorian bushfires to $860 million, with commercial properties accounting for the largest share of insured losses. - read more

What QBE and Blue Zebra’s Motor Partnership Means for Operators

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

QBE and Blue Zebra have extended their motor underwriting partnership, with Blue Zebra confirming a new multi-year agreement after the previous arrangement expired. QBE has been underwriting Blue Zebra’s commercial and private motor products since July last year, following the end of the agency’s earlier arrangement with Youi. - read more

Click for more Insurance News