The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The rules do not mean every contact with older engineered stone is automatically prohibited. Existing benchtops and surfaces may still need removal, repair or modification in limited circumstances, but that work generally requires strict controls, proper risk assessment and evidence that the business is following workplace health and safety duties. That distinction matters because many tradies are now being asked to prove how they manage silica exposure before they can access sites, win tenders or satisfy principal contractors.
From an insurance perspective, silica management sits across more than one policy. Public liability may respond if a third party alleges injury or property damage linked to work performed. Workers compensation insurance becomes critical where employees, apprentices or certain contractors are exposed during the course of work. Professional indemnity may also be relevant for businesses that provide advice, design input, specifications or supervision connected to stone or dust-generating work.
The practical risk for tradies is that poor records can make a difficult claim even harder. Insurers commonly look at whether the business was licensed where required, whether the declared business activities match the work being performed, and whether legal or safety obligations were followed. If a policy excludes unlawful work, known hazardous activities or failure to take reasonable precautions, a gap between paperwork and real site practice can become expensive.
Trade business owners should treat silica controls as part of their insurance housekeeping. Useful steps include:
The broader lesson is that safety compliance and insurance are increasingly connected. A cheaper premium is of limited value if the policy was arranged on an incomplete description of the work. For tradies dealing with silica risks, the best protection is a combination of strong site controls, accurate disclosure, well-kept records and cover that reflects the jobs actually being done.
Published:Wednesday, 19th Aug 2026
Author: Paige Estritori
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Rate this article
0 Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.