Ombudsman Orders Higher Compensation From Insurer Over Mould Dispute

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The homeowner, dissatisfied with earlier repair efforts concluded in May 2023, cited an expert analysis revealing ongoing mould contamination. The analysis detailed "moisture migration" from damp materials on the ground floor contributing to mould growth on the upper levels of the home. A mycologist’s inspection in August 2023 uncovered significant fungal spore concentrations throughout the property, including in the insulation and air-conditioning system.

Subsequent investigations indicated elevated spore levels within key areas such as a bedroom and bathroom. The mycologist conclusively stated that the property was not adequately remediated for mould.

Hollard refuted these findings, asserting repair work was satisfactory and contested the reliability of the homeowner's assessments, which were conducted six to ten weeks after Hollard’s expert, WEC, had reportedly verified the mould issues as resolved. Hollard suggested that any ongoing mould presence could be attributed to external factors, such as the homeowner’s pets or workers.

Conversely, the AFCA panel criticised Hollard’s WEC findings for their lack of specificity, primarily relying on generalized airborne mould testing. In contrast, the complainant's experts provided more comprehensive evaluations evidencing persistent mould issues.

The AFCA noted a contradiction in Hollard’s stance, linking the return of mould to non-claimable factors, as this was not in alignment with its own investigations which attempted to undermine the homeowner's findings of mould.

The authority concluded that Hollard had inadequately addressed the mould issue, likely exacerbated by insufficient containment and delays, allowing its spread to the upstairs area of the property.

In light of these findings, AFCA recommended a fair resolution involving a cash settlement to encompass a renewed scope of works with a 15% contingency increase. Moreover, Hollard is required to fund alternative accommodation while the property remains uninhabitable, compensate for any damage from its repair work, and cover the homeowner’s expert costs.

Additionally, Hollard has been mandated to pay a total of $5,400 in damages-$2,500 for the unresolved mould issue and $2,900 for failing to adhere to an earlier AFCA dispute outcome.

Published:Monday, 10th Mar 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Bali Theft Warnings Highlight a Bigger Travel Insurance Question

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent reports of phone and jewellery snatch-thefts in popular Bali tourist areas have put personal belongings back in the travel insurance spotlight. For Australians heading to Indonesia, the issue is not simply whether a stolen phone can be claimed. It is whether the policy they choose properly matches the risks they are most likely to face while away. - read more

New Small Business Insurance Education Push Highlights Underinsurance Risk

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A new alliance between the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Zest Insurance is putting small business underinsurance back in the spotlight, with education, practical tools and risk resources to be delivered through the Chamber’s THRIVE program. - read more

Why a Food Delivery Theft Claim Matters for Restaurant Insurance

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent insurance dispute involving a food delivery business offers a practical warning for Australian restaurant and café operators: if a location is not listed on the policy schedule, the cover may not respond when something goes wrong. - read more

What a Renewed Flood Pool Debate Means for Strata Communities

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The question of whether Australia needs a dedicated flood reinsurance pool has returned to the insurance agenda, with fresh attention following severe July weather across southern and eastern Australia and the ongoing statutory review of the Cyclone Reinsurance Pool. For strata committees, the debate matters because flood remains one of the clearest pressure points in property insurance affordability, particularly for schemes with basement car parks, lifts, electrical infrastructure, waterfront exposure or poor drainage. - read more

Netstrata Proceedings Put Strata Insurance Disclosure Under Fresh Scrutiny

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

NSW Fair Trading’s criminal proceedings against Netstrata have put strata insurance governance back in the spotlight, particularly for owners corporations trying to understand whether their premiums, commissions and service arrangements are being handled transparently. The action, reported on 9 July 2026, alleges the strata manager failed to adequately disclose or manage conflicts of interest and received undisclosed financial benefits. Netstrata has indicated the charges will be defended, so the matter remains before the courts rather than resolved. - read more

Click for more Insurance News