Ombudsman Orders Higher Compensation From Insurer Over Mould Dispute

0

The homeowner, dissatisfied with earlier repair efforts concluded in May 2023, cited an expert analysis revealing ongoing mould contamination. The analysis detailed "moisture migration" from damp materials on the ground floor contributing to mould growth on the upper levels of the home. A mycologist’s inspection in August 2023 uncovered significant fungal spore concentrations throughout the property, including in the insulation and air-conditioning system.

Subsequent investigations indicated elevated spore levels within key areas such as a bedroom and bathroom. The mycologist conclusively stated that the property was not adequately remediated for mould.

Hollard refuted these findings, asserting repair work was satisfactory and contested the reliability of the homeowner's assessments, which were conducted six to ten weeks after Hollard’s expert, WEC, had reportedly verified the mould issues as resolved. Hollard suggested that any ongoing mould presence could be attributed to external factors, such as the homeowner’s pets or workers.

Conversely, the AFCA panel criticised Hollard’s WEC findings for their lack of specificity, primarily relying on generalized airborne mould testing. In contrast, the complainant's experts provided more comprehensive evaluations evidencing persistent mould issues.

The AFCA noted a contradiction in Hollard’s stance, linking the return of mould to non-claimable factors, as this was not in alignment with its own investigations which attempted to undermine the homeowner's findings of mould.

The authority concluded that Hollard had inadequately addressed the mould issue, likely exacerbated by insufficient containment and delays, allowing its spread to the upstairs area of the property.

In light of these findings, AFCA recommended a fair resolution involving a cash settlement to encompass a renewed scope of works with a 15% contingency increase. Moreover, Hollard is required to fund alternative accommodation while the property remains uninhabitable, compensate for any damage from its repair work, and cover the homeowner’s expert costs.

Additionally, Hollard has been mandated to pay a total of $5,400 in damages—$2,500 for the unresolved mould issue and $2,900 for failing to adhere to an earlier AFCA dispute outcome.

Published:Monday, 10th Mar 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Rules in Favour of Owners in Lift Vandalism Dispute 28 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori In a landmark decision, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has mandated that Chubb Insurance replace the hoist ropes of two lifts in an apartment block, following damage attributed to vandalism. The owners' corporation successfully argued that the damage to the lifts was part of a previously recognized vandalism incident. - read more

NSW Government Targets Predatory Practice of Claim Farming 28 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales Government is taking decisive action against 'claim farming', a predatory practice that exploits vulnerable individuals by pressuring them to file compensation claims. This practice often involves unethical tactics targeting susceptible groups, including child abuse survivors. To combat this, the government is set to introduce the Claim Farming Practices Prohibition Bill 2025. - read more

RAA Partners with Duck Creek for Major Tech Overhaul 27 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Royal Automobile Association (RAA), a leading motoring group in South Australia, is set to revamp its technology infrastructure by adopting Duck Creek's OnDemand cloud platform. This strategic transition will see RAA's outdated systems for motor and home insurance transformed to include streamlined policy, rating, billing, and claims management, as well as enhanced data handling and insights capabilities. - read more

Consumer Advocates Criticise Insurers Over 'Poverty Premiums' and 'Loyalty Taxes' 26 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori Consumer advocacy groups have voiced strong opposition to the insurance industry's decision to reject recommendations designed to eliminate practices that disadvantage consumers, including charging higher rates for monthly bill payments and increasing renewal premiums for loyal customers. The Financial Rights Legal Centre has cited ongoing reports from consumers being adversely affected by these pricing practices, which they refer to as a 'poverty premium' and a 'loyalty tax.' - read more

Urgent Reforms Needed to Curb Rising Motor Insurance Premiums 25 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for urgent action to address the factors driving the significant rise in motor insurance premiums. In a detailed policy paper, the ICA has outlined a strategic plan, urging government intervention to address key issues like labour shortages, supply chain disruptions, and inefficiencies in accident management practices. - read more